🔗 Share this article

The Australian controversial move to restrict social media access for young people below 16 is sparking debate internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and parents are observing intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for the rest of the world.

Across Europe Momentum

Across Europe, a rising group of countries are considering parallel bans.

• The Danish government has stated a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM arguing that phones and apps are "stealing our kids' innocence". Legislation is expected to be passed soon.
• Norway is preparing to enforce a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is developing a digital wallet to verify the user details of social media participants. Authorities have suggested that an Australian-model ban could be "an tools on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has called on parliament to approve a proposal raising the legal age for joining social media to 16.
• In The French government, the president has floated the idea of a ban for those under fifteen, and a legislative committee has suggested a related move, potentially involving an overnight "digital curfew" for 15- to 18-year-olds.
• The authorities in The Dutch government has urged families to block their youngsters from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has approved a advisory statement demanding a ban for under-16s except if guardian approval is given. Although it warns of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the resolution does not create binding law.

"A clear age restriction is a solid foundation," said the MEP supporting the measure.

Britain: A Cautious Stance

For the United Kingdom, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, stating that "no option is off the table" but stressing any decision must be "supported by conclusive research".

Last year, support grew behind a bill to enact controls on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to further research the topic.

Charities have voiced concerns. One foundation set up by the family of a girl who took her own life after encountering harmful online content argues that a simple age ban may not protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when young people become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the failure of the social media companies to create tools that are safe and fit for children," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, regulation is largely occurring at the state level due to country-wide gridlock.

• Utah requires adult approval for minors to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law prohibiting those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law limiting minors to one hour of social media use per day, with any further use requiring a guardian's okay.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have similarly introduced bills demanding adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and proposals from certain politicians to mimic the Australian path, a US-wide ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Views

Apart from these regions, further countries are similarly exploring options.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers beginning next year.
• Brazil has lifted the access age for Instagram to 16.

But, global organizations take a more measured stance. Unicef has warned that social media bans pose dangers and "may even prove counterproductive". The agency points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for platform operators to prioritize user protection.

While this international conversation evolves, the steps of this nation and its followers indicate that policymakers around the world are no longer willing to stand by for platforms to self-regulate.